Subject	eibach does not account for the 2+2.
Posted by	Z U N L on February 20, 2006 at 3:01 PM
	This message has been viewed 32 times.
In Reply To	Springs posted by dondon on February 20, 2006 at 01:57 PM
Message	I'm not sure about the other brands listed, but Eibach does not account for any difference between 2 seater and 2+2. The TT springs would probably suit you better than the NA springs. I have the NA springs, and the rear end "sags" slightly compared to the front because the 2+2 has a heavier rear end than the 2+0. "The two seater is being joined in a few weeks by a larger two-plus-two model with a rear seat for munchkins." ~Jim Mateja, Chicago Tribune, in regards to the Z32. Andrew Janeshek // jnshk@aol.com // 1992 NA 2+2 [Stage 2-ish]
Follow Ups	Springs - dondon 13:57:13 02/20/06 Sure they do. - Kenny 14:03:16 02/20/06 WOW Kenny! are u sick or something? - testingzwaters 15:22:14 02/20/06 Do not try to predict what the Mango will say. - Kenny 16:53:02 02/20/06 Re: Springs (n/m) - dondon 14:11:31 02/20/06 get ones for the TT since both the 2+2 and TT are heavier - telegraph(Denver) 14:17:28 02/20/06 2nd (n/m) - BradZ (FL) 14:46:53 02/20/06 Do you have any pics of the RS*R springs on your 2+2? - Z U N L 15:05:49 02/20/06 Yep...sorry I haven't taken time to post "after" pics yet.. - BradZ (FL) 19:04:36 02/20/06 check your email (n/m) - Rbadger 14:24:07 02/20/06 eibach does not account for the 2+2. - Z U N L 15:01:26 02/20/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.